From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thornton

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 9, 2000
NO. 76014 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2000)

Opinion

NO. 76014.

Date of Journalization: March 9, 2000.

Application for Reopening, Motion No. 08113, Lower Court No. CP CR-358608.

WILLIAM D. MASON, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, BY: DIANE SMILANICK (#0019987) and LOUIS BRODNIK (#0022714), Assistant County Prosecuting Attorneys, 1200 Ontario Street, Cleveland, OH 44113, For Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Thornton (#P00076014A), Inmate No. 367-887-BECI, 68518 Bannock Rd., SR331, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950, For Defendant-Appellant.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


In State v. Thornton, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-358608, applicant pled guilty to two counts of attempted assault on a peace officer with peace officer specifications. This court dismissed applicant's appeal for failure to file the record in State v. Thornton (Apr. 15, 1999), Cuyahoga App. No. 76014, unreported.

Applicant has filed with the clerk of this court a timely application for reopening. As required by App.R. 26(B)(6), the reasons for denying the application for reopening follow.

Applicant filed his direct appeal pro se.

Regarding pro se appeals, this court has previously said:

App.R. 26(B)(1) provides in part that "[a] defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel." Applicant acted pro se in his appeal and therefore is precluded from applying for reopening based upon "a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel."

State v. Drake (July 2, 1998), Cuyahoga App. No. 74661, unreported, reopening disallowed (June 24, 1999), Motion No. 4637, at 2-3. Reopening is not, therefore, appropriate.

We note, however, that a party may seek reinstatement after dismissal for failure to file the record under Loc.App.R. 10.

Accordingly, the application for reopening is denied.

________________________________ LEO M. SPELLACY, JUDGE
TERRENCE O'DONNELL, P.J. and DIANE KARPINSKY, J. CONCUR.


Summaries of

State v. Thornton

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Mar 9, 2000
NO. 76014 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2000)
Case details for

State v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, vs. ROBERT THORNTON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Mar 9, 2000

Citations

NO. 76014 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2000)

Citing Cases

State v. Walton

{¶5} A claim of ineffective assistance of appellate is not available where an appellant acts pro se in an…

State v. Robinson

This court has held that "[a] claim of ineffective assistance of appellate [counsel] is not available where…