From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thompson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 15, 2007
166 P.3d 575 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. F13291; A132620.

Submitted on record and briefs July 6, 2007.

August 15, 2007.

Appeal from the Union County Circuit Court, Phillip A. Mendiguren, Judge.

Rankin Johnson IV filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was convicted on one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and one count of third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine of $1,000. Defendant asserts that no evidence was presented to support such a fine. The state concedes that such fines may not be imposed in the absence of evidence that, in this case, the victim has actually suffered a pecuniary loss. We find the state's concession to be well-taken and, consequently, accept it. See State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 995 P2d 1202 (2000).

Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Thompson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 15, 2007
166 P.3d 575 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LEROY EDWIN THOMPSON…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 15, 2007

Citations

166 P.3d 575 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
166 P.3d 575

Citing Cases

State v. Thompson

On appeal from that sentence, the state conceded that the evidence did not establish that the victims had…