From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 14, 2021
No. 2021-UP-269 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-269

07-14-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Rasheem Kevin Thomas, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-001072

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted June 1, 2021

Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 14, 2021
No. 2021-UP-269 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Rasheem Kevin Thomas, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-269 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)