From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 14, 2021
Appellate Case No. 2019-001072 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-001072 Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-269

07-14-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Rasheem Kevin Thomas, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Florence County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jul 14, 2021
Appellate Case No. 2019-001072 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Rasheem Kevin Thomas, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2019-001072 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 14, 2021)