From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 13, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-361 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-361

06-13-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Tra Vaughn Larol Thomas, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.


Unpublished Opinion

Submitted June 1, 2012

Appeal From Greenville County C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Tra Vaughn Larol Thomas appeals his conviction of armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred and violated his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial by summarily excluding Thomas's family members and neighbors from the courtroom during the State's witness's testimony. Thomas maintains his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the trial court neither articulated an overriding interest in closing the courtroom nor considered all reasonable alternatives to the closure. Because Thomas did not raise this specific issue when he objected to the trial court's decision, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: In re Care & Treatment of Corley, 365 S.C. 252, 258, 616 S.E.2d 441, 444 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Constitutional issues, like most others, must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for appeal."); State v. Baker, 390 S.C. 56, 65, 700 S.E.2d 440, 444 (Ct. App. 2010) (holding constitutional claims must be raised at trial to be preserved for review); id. (holding a party may not raise one ground to the trial court and a different ground on appeal).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 13, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-361 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Tra Vaughn Larol Thomas, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 13, 2012

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-361 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 13, 2012)