From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Theiss

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Jun 30, 2003
No. CA2002-09-234 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 2003)

Opinion

No. CA2002-09-234.

June 30, 2003.

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Case No. CR02-05-0874.

Robin Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011, for plaintiff-appellee.

John H. Forg, 830 Main Street, Suite 806, Cincinnati, OH 45202, for defendant-appellant.


DECISION


{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Norman G. Theiss, Sr., filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

VALEN, P.J., YOUNG and POWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Theiss

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Jun 30, 2003
No. CA2002-09-234 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 2003)
Case details for

State v. Theiss

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORMAN G. THEISS, SR.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County

Date published: Jun 30, 2003

Citations

No. CA2002-09-234 (Ohio Ct. App. Jun. 30, 2003)