From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Terrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1938
199 S.E. 76 (N.C. 1938)

Opinion

(Filed 19 October, 1938.)

Appeal and Error § 38 —

When the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendant from Williams, J., at May Term, 1938, of WARREN. Affirmed.

Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorneys-General Bruton and Wettach for the State.

Banzet Banzet, John Kerr, Jr., and Yarborough Yarborough for defendant, appellant.


This is a criminal action in which the defendant was tried under a bill of indictment charging him with the murder of one Andrew Knight. The defendant was first tried at the May Term, 1937, of Warren, and was convicted of murder in the second degree. On appeal to this Court a new trial was ordered. S. v. Terrell, 212 N.C. 145. When the cause again came on for trial in the court below the defendant was again convicted of murder in the second degree. From judgment pronounced thereon the defendant appealed.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Schenck, J., not sitting, as to whether harmful error was committed in the trial of the defendant, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision of this action without becoming a precedent.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Terrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1938
199 S.E. 76 (N.C. 1938)
Case details for

State v. Terrell

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. TED TERRELL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1938

Citations

199 S.E. 76 (N.C. 1938)
214 N.C. 831