From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 24, 1995
72 Ohio St. 3d 247 (Ohio 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-2531

Submitted February 21, 1995 —

Decided May 24, 1995.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 65312.

Appellant, Harry Terrell, was convicted of felonious assault with a firearm specification. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Terrell (May 26, 1994), Cuyahoga App. No. 65312, unreported, 1994 WL 236279. Subsequently, Terrell filed an application to reopen his appeal under App.R. 26(B), alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The court of appeals denied the application, finding that the issues were res judicata because they were or could have been raised on Terrell's appeal of his conviction to this court, and independent review failed to disclose any genuine issue of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Terrell then appealed to this court.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Diane Smilanick, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Harry Terrell, pro se.


The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 24, 1995
72 Ohio St. 3d 247 (Ohio 1995)
Case details for

State v. Terrell

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TERRELL, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 24, 1995

Citations

72 Ohio St. 3d 247 (Ohio 1995)
648 N.E.2d 1353

Citing Cases

Tucker v. Ohio

These issues have been addressed in his previous direct appeal and therefore are barred from further review…

Thompson v. Bradshaw

"[T]he Supreme Court of Ohio has repeatedly ruled that even having the ability to raise the issue of…