From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 10, 2006
2006 Ohio 2226 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

2006-0568.

May 10, 2006.

Montgomery App. Nos. 20649, 20654 and 20655, 2006-Ohio-313.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals' Decision and Entry filed February 28, 2006:

"Whether a conviction for an attempted drug offense that would have been, if successfully completed, a first-degree felony, but which becomes a second degree felony by virtue of the fact that it is merely an attempt to commit an offense, is subject to the mandatory prison term provisions in R.C. 2925.11."

RESNICK, PFEIFER and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Pringle (June 30, 1999), Lucas App. No. L-98-1275.


Summaries of

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 10, 2006
2006 Ohio 2226 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

State v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. TAYLOR

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 10, 2006

Citations

2006 Ohio 2226 (Ohio 2006)
109 Ohio St. 3d 1454
847 N.E.2d 4