From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Jul 23, 2010
No. 06-10-00016-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2010)

Opinion

No. 06-10-00016-CR

Submitted: July 6, 2010.

Decided: July 23, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court, Fannin County, Texas, Trial Court No. 23054.

Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


In its indictment, the State alleged that, on or about August 13, 2008, John Hardy Taylor was the owner of a dog he knew to be dangerous. It is further alleged that, on the date in question, Taylor's dangerous dog, while not restrained in a secure enclosure, made an unprovoked attack on Haiden Lynn McCurry, causing serious bodily injury — a violation of Section 822.005(a)(2) of the Texas Health and Safety Code. The trial court dismissed the indictment against Taylor with prejudice on the grounds that Section 822.005(a)(2) of the Texas Health and Safety Code is an unconstitutionally vague, strict-liability statute. TEX. HEALTH SAFETY CODE ANN. § 822.005(a)(2) (Vernon 2010). The State appeals from the order quashing the indictment in trial court cause number 23054. The State also appeals from the order quashing the indictment in trial court cause number 23053, and has filed a single brief, in which the State raises issues common to both appeals. The State contends the statute in question is not an unconstitutionally vague, strict-liability statute, and the order quashing the indictment should therefore be reversed. We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date in cause number 06-10-00015-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that the statute is constitutional, but nevertheless affirm and modify the order quashing the indictment because it fails to allege a culpable mental state. As modified, the order of the trial court is affirmed.

Because this is an appeal of a pretrial order, no testimony or evidence appears in the record.

As explained in our opinion of this date in cause number 06-10-00015-CR, the trial court dismissed the indictment with prejudice. Because the statute is not unconstitutional, the indictment should have been dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana
Jul 23, 2010
No. 06-10-00016-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2010)
Case details for

State v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. JOHN HARDY TAYLOR, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Sixth District, Texarkana

Date published: Jul 23, 2010

Citations

No. 06-10-00016-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 23, 2010)