From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 25, 2015
368 N.C. 300 (N.C. 2015)

Summary

reversing the Court of Ap- peals opinion "[f]or reasons stated in the dissenting opinion."

Summary of this case from State v. Aguilar

Opinion

No. 1A15.

2015-09-25

STATE of North Carolina v. Bo Anderson TAYLOR.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Nicholas C. Woomer–Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.


Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 767 S.E.2d 585 (2014), finding error in judgments entered on 16 September 2011 by Judge Charles H. Henry in Superior Court, New Hanover County, and ordering that defendant receive a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 2 September 2015. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Nicholas C. Woomer–Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.

For reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of defendant's remaining issue on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED. Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Sep 25, 2015
368 N.C. 300 (N.C. 2015)

reversing the Court of Ap- peals opinion "[f]or reasons stated in the dissenting opinion."

Summary of this case from State v. Aguilar
Case details for

State v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Bo Anderson TAYLOR.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Sep 25, 2015

Citations

368 N.C. 300 (N.C. 2015)
776 S.E.2d 680

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

Testimony that the investigating detective was unable to reach defendant to question him during her…

State v. Burgess

In State v. Taylor , the prosecutor had asked the detective during direct examination why she decided to move…