From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tate

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 16, 2013
2013-UP-391 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-391

10-16-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Ricky Tate, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-196770

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Ricky Tate, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted September 1, 2013

Appeal From Cherokee County J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Ricky Tate, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Tate

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 16, 2013
2013-UP-391 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ricky Tate, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-391 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2013)