State v. Tate

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Ricky Tate, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2011-196770 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-196770 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-391

2013-10-16

The State, Respondent, v. Ricky Tate, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Ricky Tate, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Cherokee County

J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Ricky Tate, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.