From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tassin

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 31, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0219 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017 KW 0219

03-31-2017

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. SAXON ARUS TASSIN


In Re: Saxon Arus Tassin, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 15-032416. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J, GUIDRY AND McCLENDON, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 929(A); see also State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 (per curiam).

PMc

VGW

Guidry, J., dissents in part. Because relator's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is one which, if established, would entitle him to relief, I find merit in relator's contention that the trial court erred in wholly dismissing his application for postconviction relief on the pleadings, pursuant to La. Code Crim. P. art. 928. See U.S. Const. amend. VI; La. Const. art. I, § 13; see also La. Code Crim. P. art. 930.3(1). Accordingly, I would vacate the trial court's ruling, but only with respect to the ineffective assistance of counsel claim, and order the trial court to determine whether this claim could be summarily dismissed under La. Code Crim. P. art. 929, or whether it would warrant an evidentiary hearing under La. Code Crim. P. art. 930(A). COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Tassin

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Mar 31, 2017
NO. 2017 KW 0219 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Tassin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. SAXON ARUS TASSIN

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

NO. 2017 KW 0219 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2017)