Under General Statutes § 54–91a, a sentencing court is required to consider the information contained in the presentence investigation report. See also State v. Tarasco, 301 Conn. 103, 107, 22 A.3d 530 (2011) (“it is axiomatic that the trial court must consider during sentencing the information contained in a presentence investigation report”). The state asked the court to impose an effective sentence of 120 years imprisonment because, in its view, the defendant “should never ever be on the streets again.”
Under General Statutes § 54-91a, a sentencing court is required to consider the information contained in the presentence investigation report. See also State v. Tarasco, 301 Conn. 103, 107, 22 A.3d 530 (2011) (''it is axiomatic that the trial court must consider during sentencing the information contained in a presentence investigation report''). The state asked the court to impose an effective sentence of 120 years imprisonment because, in its view, the defendant ''should never ever be on the streets again.
The victim quickly began arguing with the defendant’s party, and, shortly thereafter, the defendant shot him, mortally wounding him." State v. Tarasco, 301 Conn. 103, 104, 22 A.3d 530, 531-32 (2011). On August 11, 2008, the petitioner was sentenced to 50 years incarceration.