From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tanner

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
May 23, 2021
316 So. 3d 826 (La. 2021)

Opinion

No. 2021-KK-00698

05-23-2021

STATE of Louisiana v. Bryant Scott TANNER


On Supervisory Writ to the 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany

Granted . The State is ordered to expeditiously designate for relator's defense counsel the order in which the State intends to call defense counsel's cases for trial on Tuesday, June 1, 2021. See State v. Simpson , 551 So.2d 1303, 1305 (La. 1989) ("Since adequate notice is a fundamental element of due process, the criminal docket for a particular day must indicate the order in which cases are to be called for trial.") (citations omitted), citing State v. Ray , 474 So.2d 954 (La. 1985). In any event, this list shall be provided no later than Wednesday, May 26, 2021.

We are mindful that the State has the ultimate authority to determine "whom, when, and how" to prosecute, and circumstances may, at times, require a departure from the ordered list. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 61 ; State v. Chapman , 10-1510 (La. 10/29/10), 46 So.3d 660. Nonetheless, the State remains obligated to provide defendants with fair notice of the probability that their cases will or will not go to trial on the date assigned. Id. The State should also be mindful that, while the Sixth Amendment primarily guarantees the right to effective counsel, it also includes the right to an attorney who has been given adequate time to prepare for trial. Wheat v. United States , 486 U.S. 153, 159, 108 S. Ct. 1692, 1696, 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988) ; Powell v. Alabama , 287 U.S. 45, 53, 53 S. Ct. 55, 58, 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932).


Summaries of

State v. Tanner

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
May 23, 2021
316 So. 3d 826 (La. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Tanner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. BRYANT SCOTT TANNER

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: May 23, 2021

Citations

316 So. 3d 826 (La. 2021)