From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Symington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 79872

06-12-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patrick M. SYMINGTON, Appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant


Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Ellen H. Flottman, for Appellant

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Symington appeals his conviction following bench trial in Buchanan County for enticement of a child. He presents three points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. Second, he argues the trial court erred in admitting propensity evidence. Finally, Symington says the trial court erred in admitting Facebook messages without a foundation. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Symington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 12, 2018
548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Symington

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patrick M. SYMINGTON, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

Citations

548 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Symington v. State

We affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct appeal in a per curiam order. State v. Symington , 548…