From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Ake v. Swanson

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 10, 1934
156 So. 481 (Fla. 1934)

Summary

denying writ of mandamus without prejudice and with leave to prosecute same in circuit court where it appeared "that no sufficient reason exists why the Supreme Court should take original jurisdiction of this matter"

Summary of this case from Harvard v. Singletary

Opinion

Order Entered September 10, 1934.

A petition for an alternative writ of mandamus.

C. L. Chancey, for Relator.


The petition for alternative writ of mandamus filed herein on September 10, 1934, having been presented to and considered by this Court, is denied without prejudice, with leave to file and prosecute the same in the Circuit Court, it appearing that no sufficient reason exists why the Supreme Court should take original jurisdiction of this matter.

Alternative writ of mandamus denied without prejudice with leave to prosecute suit in Circuit Court.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Ake v. Swanson

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 10, 1934
156 So. 481 (Fla. 1934)

denying writ of mandamus without prejudice and with leave to prosecute same in circuit court where it appeared "that no sufficient reason exists why the Supreme Court should take original jurisdiction of this matter"

Summary of this case from Harvard v. Singletary
Case details for

State ex rel. Ake v. Swanson

Case Details

Full title:STATE, ex rel. ALTON M. AKE, v. THOMAS E. SWANSON, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 10, 1934

Citations

156 So. 481 (Fla. 1934)
116 Fla. 464

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Scaldeferri v. Sandstrom

Art. V, §§ 4 and 5; CrPR 3.130(c)(2). Renaldi concluded that the more efficient and proper jurisdiction of…

State ex Rel. Renaldi v. Sandstrom

However, it has been noted that in actions in the nature of quo warranto and mandamus brought before an…