State v. Sutton

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Petagine

    290 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 6 times
    In State v. Petagine, 290 So.3d 1106, 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020), my colleague, Judge Tanenbaum, highlighted his constitutional concerns in a thoughtful concurring opinion.

    The trial court, then, should have concerned itself with but one question: Did the defendants have enough information to know "what [they] allegedly did wrong"? State v. Sutton , 416 So. 2d 852, 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Really, though, how could they not?