Opinion
Docket No. 46529
06-24-2019
STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JEFFREY SAMUEL SUPP, Defendant-Appellant.
Charles C. Crafts; Crafts Law Office, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified life sentence, with a minimum period of confinement of fifteen years, for lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, affirmed. Charles C. Crafts; Crafts Law Office, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before HUSKEY Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge
____________________
PER CURIAM
Jeffrey Samuel Supp pleaded guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under the age of sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1508. The district court imposed a unified life sentence, with fifteen years determinate. Supp appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Supp's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.