In State v. Troupe, supra, 284, however, we restricted the doctrine so that a constancy of accusation witness could testify only to the fact and the timing of the victim's complaint.
Summary of this case from State v. Sullivan(15036)
Argued December 9, 1996
Officially released January 7, 1997
Appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Windham, Foley, J.
In State v. Troupe, supra, 284, however, we restricted the doctrine so that a constancy of accusation witness could testify only to the fact and the timing of the victim's complaint.
Summary of this case from State v. SullivanFull title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN W. SULLIVAN
Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut
Date published: Jan 7, 1997
" The defendant appealed from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which, in a per curiam opinion, had…