From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Strother

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 20, 1910
84 S.C. 503 (S.C. 1910)

Opinion

7421

January 20, 1910.

Before SHIPP, J., Abbeville, September term, 1909. Affirmed.

Indictment against Lem Strother for murder. Defendant appeals from sentence.

Messrs. Moore Mars, for appellant.

Solicitor Cooper, contra.


January 20, 1910. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


On his trial for the murder of William Cannon the jury found the defendant guilty, with a recommendation to mercy. Thereupon the Circuit Judge imposed the sentence of life imprisonment, as provided by the statute. In the exceptions certain erroneous propositions of law are set out as having been given to the jury in the instructions contained in the charge on the subject of self-defence; but we are unable to discover in the charge the instructions imputed to the Circuit Judge. The instruction was given that the plea of self-defense is complete when established by the preponderance of the evidence; and the charge contains also an instruction that the defendant was entitled to the benefit of every reasonable doubt. There is, therefore, no ground for complaint of error in the charge as to these matters.

The context shows that the instructions on the subject of self-defence were intended to apply to the consideration of the crime of manslaughter as well as the crime of murder, and there is no foundation for the exception that the jury were not instructed to consider the plea of self-defense in connection with the crime of manslaughter. But even if it had been otherwise the error would have been harmless, for the law of self-defense was charged generally, and the charge of manslaughter was eliminated entirely by the conviction of murder.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Strother

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 20, 1910
84 S.C. 503 (S.C. 1910)
Case details for

State v. Strother

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. STROTHER

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 20, 1910

Citations

84 S.C. 503 (S.C. 1910)
66 S.E. 877

Citing Cases

State v. Habel et al

Lester F. Habel and others were convicted of accepting, receiving and transporting alcoholic liquors and the…

State v. Blakely

Now which is right is for you, I cannot intimate anything. If you find him guilty write the word "Guilty" and…