Summary
In Stotts, the Kansas Court of Appeals rejected a defendant's argument that a jury instruction failing to identify the controlled substance as marijuana was clearly erroneous.
Summary of this case from Morales v. United StatesOpinion
No. 101,828.
12-16-2011
STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Paul STOTTS, Appellant.
Thomas J. Bath and Tricia A. Bath, of Bath & Edmonds, P.A., of Overland Park, for appellant. Thomas R. Stanton, deputy district attorney, Keith E. Schroeder, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, for appellee.
Decision Without Published Opinion
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.