State v. Stockton

4 Citing cases

  1. State v. Travis

    320 Or. App. 460 (Or. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 9 times
    Rejecting the state's argument that the trial court conducted balancing with regard to propensity evidence "by implication"

    We review a trial court's determination of relevance under OEC 401 for errors of law. State v. Stockton , 310 Or. App. 116, 123, 483 P.3d 657 (2021). Likewise, we review a trial court's determination that other acts evidence is relevant and admissible under OEC 404(3) or OEC 404(4) for legal error.

  2. State v. Taylor

    326 Or. App. 396 (Or. Ct. App. 2023)   Cited 5 times
    Holding that relevant evidence that does not require a propensity bridge is admissible to show a defendant's plan

    We review a trial court's determination of relevance under OEC 401 for errors of law. State v. Stockton , 310 Or App 116, 123, 483 P.3d 657 (2021). Likewise, we review a trial court's determination that other-acts evidence is relevant and admissible under OEC 404(3) for legal error.

  3. State v. Taylor

    315 Or. App. 608 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 4 times
    Explaining inferences that jury could conceivably draw

    We review a trial court's determination of relevance under OEC 401 for errors of law. State v. Stockton , 310 Or. App. 116, 123, 483 P.3d 657 (2021). We likewise review a trial court's determination that other-acts evidence is relevant and admissible under OEC 404(3) for legal error.

  4. State v. Bonczkowski

    337 Or. App. 701 (Or. Ct. App. 2025)

    As a preliminary matter, we review a trial court's determination of relevance under OEC 401 for errors of law. State v. Stockton, 310 Or.App. 116, 123, 483 P.3d 657 (2021). We review a trial court's determination that other acts evidence is relevant and admissible under OEC 404(4) for legal error.