- Search with
- Parallel SearchEnter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
- or
- Keyword SearchEnter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
- ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
- ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
- NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
- """due diligence"Exact match
- ()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
- *withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
- !infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
- /ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
- /sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
- /padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph
State v. Stewart
No. 18-0006 (W. Va. Jan. 14, 2019)3 Citing cases
State v. Shackleford
No. 21-0265 (W. Va. Aug. 30, 2022) Cited 1 timesCotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co., 147 W.Va. 484, 128 S.E.2d 626 (1962). State v. Stewart, No. 18-0006, 2019 WL 181479, at *5 (W.Va. Jan. 14, 2019)(memorandum decision) (citation omitted).
State v. Whindleton
No. 19-0333 (W. Va. May. 26, 2020)" Syl. Pt. 3, Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. v. Huffman, 227 W.Va. 109, 705 S.E.2d 806 (2010).State v. Stewart, No. 18-0006, 2019 WL 181479, *5 (W. Va. Jan. 14, 2019) (memorandum decision). Petitioner's assertion that the deferred adjudication agreement is ambiguous does not make it so.
Allman v. Sallaz
No. 19-0012 (W. Va. Apr. 6, 2020) Cited 2 timesRelating that, after petitioner filed petition for writ of habeas corpus without representation, petitioner was appointed counsel who filed an amended petition
Syllabus point 3, Cotiga Development Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co., 147 W.Va. 484, 128 S.E.2d 626 (1962).State v. Stewart, No. 18-0006, 2019 WL 181479, at *5 (W. Va. Jan. 14, 2019)(memorandum decision) (citation omitted). With these legal principles in mind, we find no error in the habeas court's determination that petitioner was not denied a material term of her plea agreement.