From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stevens

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 5, 2015
NO. 34,080 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 5, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 34,080

05-05-2015

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Alderman Law Firm Kimberly Alderman Denver, CO for Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY
Douglas R. Driggers, District Judge
Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee Alderman Law Firm
Kimberly Alderman
Denver, CO
for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge. {1} Defendant Michael Stevens appeals from the amended judgment, order and commitment to the corrections department, following his plea agreement with the State and his initial sentencing. {2} This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm Defendant's convictions for larceny and receiving stolen property, reverse the district court's amended judgment, and remand the case to the district court to resentence Defendant consistent with the original written judgment. We also proposed to conclude that, to the extent that Defendant raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because trial counsel failed to preserve the aforementioned issues for appeal, Defendant could not demonstrate prejudice because this Court addressed his issues on appeal. {3} Defendant and the State filed separate responses in support of our notice. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm Defendant's convictions for larceny and receiving stolen property, reverse the district court's amended judgment, and remand the case to the district court to resentence Defendant consistent with the original written judgment for imposition of a total of six and one-half years of imprisonment, followed by parole. {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
/s/ _________
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Stevens

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
May 5, 2015
NO. 34,080 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 5, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL STEVENS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 5, 2015

Citations

NO. 34,080 (N.M. Ct. App. May. 5, 2015)