From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. State Racing Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 10, 1934
156 So. 910 (Fla. 1934)

Opinion

Order Entered October 10, 1934.

A case of original jurisdiction — mandamus.

Bussey, Mann and Barton, McKinney Barton and W. J. Oven for Relator;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Robert J. Pleus, Assistant, for the Respondents.


In this case the right of the relator in mandamus to maintain this proceeding in mandamus with respect to the particular things commanded to be done by the State Racing Commission appearing to this Court to be doubtful in the light of what is shown by the pleadings, it is ordered that the motion to quash the alternative writ be granted.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. State Racing Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 10, 1934
156 So. 910 (Fla. 1934)
Case details for

State v. State Racing Commission

Case Details

Full title:STATE, ex rel. McKINNEY BARTON, v. STATE RACING COMMISSION, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 10, 1934

Citations

156 So. 910 (Fla. 1934)
156 So. 910

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Allen v. Rose

In State, ex rel. Palmer, v. Atkinson, 156 So. 726, we held that where it is sought to coerce a public…