From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 5, 1969
250 A.2d 326 (Conn. 1969)

Opinion

Michael A. Rakosky, assistant prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

Joseph D. Harbaugh, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

Argued February 4, 1969

Decided February 5, 1969


It appearing that the state has failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the defendant from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit finding the defendant guilty as charged, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the judgments of the trial court and the Appellate Division are set aside and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court in the tenth circuit with direction to render judgment that the defendant is not guilty and ordering that she be discharged.


Summaries of

State v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 5, 1969
250 A.2d 326 (Conn. 1969)
Case details for

State v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. YVONNE STANLEY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Feb 5, 1969

Citations

250 A.2d 326 (Conn. 1969)
250 A.2d 326

Citing Cases

State v. McCarthy

Under such circumstances, this court will make its own determination whether, from the time an appeal is…

Ralls v. Manson

In State v. Ward, 134 Conn. 81, 54 A.2d 507 (1947), where the trial court had granted several extensions of…