From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. St. John

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 25, 1993
118 Or. App. 95 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

91CR2444; CA A73366

Submitted on record and briefs December 29, 1992

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing in part February 3, 1993 Reconsideration denied April 28, 1993 Petition for review allowed May 25, 1993 ( 316 Or. 527) See later issue of Oregon Reports

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County.

Richard L. Barron, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Riggs, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on Count 2.


Defendant was convicted on two counts of attempted rape, ORS 161.405; ORS 163.375, one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and one count of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.427. He contends that the court erred in the consecutive sentence imposed for Count 2, attempted rape, because it used the incorrect criminal history category. The state concedes that the court was incorrect in using category E. We accept the state's concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on Count 2.


Summaries of

State v. St. John

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 25, 1993
118 Or. App. 95 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. St. John

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN WILLIAM ST. JOHN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 25, 1993

Citations

118 Or. App. 95 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
844 P.2d 947

Citing Cases

State v. John

PER CURIAM The Supreme Court remanded this case for us to reconsider ourprevious opinion, State v. St. John,…