From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. St. John

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Jun 18, 2007
2007 Ohio 3002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. CA2007-01-032.

June 18, 2007.

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Case No. CR2005-05-0916.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael A. Oster, Jr., for plaintiff-appellee, State of Ohio.

Charles M. Conliff, for defendant-appellant, William St. John III.


DECISION


{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, William St. John III, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal, " Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

YOUNG, P.J., BRESSLER and WALSH, JJ., concur.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.


Summaries of

State v. St. John

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
Jun 18, 2007
2007 Ohio 3002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. St. John

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William St. John III…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County

Date published: Jun 18, 2007

Citations

2007 Ohio 3002 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)