From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Spidell

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 27, 1973
206 N.W.2d 848 (Neb. 1973)

Opinion

No. 38843.

Filed April 27, 1973.

Appeal from the District Court for Otoe County: WALTER H. SMITH, Judge. Affirmed.

John F. Steinheider, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Harold Mosher, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.


Defendant pled guilty to a charge of forgery and was sentenced to a term of 5 to 10 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. The sole issue on appeal is the claim that the sentence is excessive. The sentence indeed is a severe one, but we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion.

We have carefully examined the record, including the presentence report. The defendant has spent a major part of his adult life in penal institutions with rather brief periods of freedom between terms. He adapts well to prison life but is indifferent to programs of rehabilitation and has found it difficult to cope with the problems which confront the person released or paroled from prison. Imprisonment as means of rehabilitation has failed, but the trial court could apparently see no reasonable alternative. The comments of the trial court at sentencing indicate the sentence was intended to afford the defendant maximum motivation and opportunity for participation in rehabilitative programs.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Spidell

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 27, 1973
206 N.W.2d 848 (Neb. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Spidell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. ROBERT FRANKLIN SPIDELL, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Apr 27, 1973

Citations

206 N.W.2d 848 (Neb. 1973)
190 Neb. 181

Citing Cases

State v. Spidell

It is fundamental that in order to maintain an action under the Post Conviction Act the prisoner must allege…