Opinion
1 CA-CR 21-0046 PRPC
08-24-2021
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. ERIC SNYDER, Petitioner.
Yuma County Attorney's Office, Yuma By Charles V. S. Platt Counsel for Respondent Yuma County Public Defender's Office, Yuma By Zachary J. Dumyahn Counsel for Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yuma County No. S1400CR2018000204 The Honorable Roger A. Nelson, Judge.
Yuma County Attorney's Office, Yuma
By Charles V. S. Platt
Counsel for Respondent
Yuma County Public Defender's Office, Yuma
By Zachary J. Dumyahn
Counsel for Petitioner
Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Chief Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
¶1 Petitioner Eric Snyder seeks review of the superior court's order denying his first petition for post-conviction relief.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition for review and response. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.