From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Snowden

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jul 11, 2016
60 N.E.3d 1252 (Ohio 2016)

Opinion

Nos. 2015–1247 2015–1335.

07-11-2016

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. SNOWDEN, Appellant.

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecuting Attorney, and LuWayne Annos, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. DeGenova & Yarwood, Ltd., Ronald D. Yarwood, and Edward A. Czopur, Youngstown, for appellant.


Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecuting Attorney, and LuWayne Annos, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

DeGenova & Yarwood, Ltd., Ronald D. Yarwood, and Edward A. Czopur, Youngstown, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Klembus, 146 Ohio St.3d 84, 2016-Ohio-1092, 51 N.E.3d 641.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Snowden

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jul 11, 2016
60 N.E.3d 1252 (Ohio 2016)
Case details for

State v. Snowden

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. SNOWDEN, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jul 11, 2016

Citations

60 N.E.3d 1252 (Ohio 2016)
147 Ohio St. 3d 95
2016 Ohio 4856

Citing Cases

Snowden v. Bracy

DiscussionFirst: as to all petitioner's contentions about ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC), except for…