From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1993
335 N.C. 162 (N.C. 1993)

Opinion

No. 213A93

Filed 5 November 1993

Appeal by the State pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 110 N.C. App. 119, 429 S.E.2d 425 (1993), finding error in defendant's conviction for robbery with a firearm at the 27 August 1991 Criminal Session, Superior Court, Brunswick County, Ellis, J., presiding, and remanding this charge for a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 October 1993.

Michael F. Easley, Attorney General, by Daniel C. Oakley, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Michael Ramos for defendant-appellee.


At trial defendant was convicted of first-degree kidnapping (91 CRS 2720), larceny of a firearm (91 CRS 2722), first-degree sex offense (91 CRS 3100) and robbery with a firearm (91 CRS 3332). A majority of the Court of Appeals, Judge Cozort dissenting, found error in the trial court's failure to instruct on the lesser included offense of assault with a deadly weapon in the robbery case and remanded this case for a new trial. The Court of Appeals unanimously found no error in the other convictions.

The State appeals to us on the basis of Judge Cozort's dissent, contending that the Court of Appeals' decision in the robbery case was erroneous. We conclude the decision should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1993
335 N.C. 162 (N.C. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES WAYNE SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1993

Citations

335 N.C. 162 (N.C. 1993)
435 S.E.2d 770

Citing Cases

State v. Sakobie

Further, the cases that have focused on whether or not the release of a victim was in a safe place have been…

State v. Corbett

tion of whether a kidnapping victim was released in a safe place has been decided on a case-by-case basis.…