From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 20, 2003
99 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 80223

September 3, 2002 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 20, 2003

Appeal from the City of St. Louis, Circuit Court; Philip Heagney, Judge.

David Hemingway, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Audara Charlton, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.



ORDER


Juan R. Smith (Appellant) appeals the trial court's ruling denying his pre-sentence Motion to Withdraw a Guilty Plea (Motion) pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. State v. Taylor, 929 S.W.2d 209, 215 (Mo.banc 1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2002, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Feb 20, 2003
99 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Juan R. Smith, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Feb 20, 2003

Citations

99 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)