From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 25, 1993
856 P.2d 646 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

CR92-112; CA A75497

Submitted on record and briefs July 27, reversed and remanded for trial August 25, 1993

Appeal from District Court, Umatilla County.

Richard Courson, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Durham and Leeson, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for trial.


Defendant appeals his conviction for second degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.354, assigning error to the entry of the judgment of conviction based on his plea of guilty and to the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction. He argues, and the state concedes, that, because the record contains no evidence that he entered a guilty plea, entry of the judgment of conviction based on the plea was error. We accept the state's concession. ORS 135.385 to ORS 135.395; Stelts v. State of Oregon, 299 Or. 252, 701 P.2d 1047 (1985).

Reversed and remanded for trial.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Oregon Court of Appeals
Aug 25, 1993
856 P.2d 646 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RODRICK WARREN SMITH, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 25, 1993

Citations

856 P.2d 646 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
856 P.2d 646