From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 1999
704 N.E.2d 1241 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-2730

Submitted October 28, 1998

Decided February 10, 1999.

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No. CA97-01-011.

John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Daniel G. Eichel and Richard A. Hyde, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee.

David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and Lori J. Rankin, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

Keith A. Yeazel, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

William Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Erika Ritt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office.


The cause is dismissed for want of a conflict within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2) (B).

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 1999
704 N.E.2d 1241 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SMITH, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 10, 1999

Citations

704 N.E.2d 1241 (Ohio 1999)
704 N.E.2d 1241

Citing Cases

State v. Saylor

The Supreme Court accepted the certification on January 28, 1998 under case No. 97-2730. However, the…

State v. Murawski

A trial judge is not required to accept affidavits which, on their face, appear patently incredible. State v.…