From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 25, 1984
452 So. 2d 160 (La. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-K-0976.

June 25, 1984.

On Application for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches.


GRANTED. The sentences are vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for a hearing before a different trial judge to determine whether there was a meeting of the minds between the defendant, the defense counsel, the prosecutor and the trial judge as to the plea bargain outlined in defendant's affidavit of understanding. The judge shall then decide whether due process requires (a) that there be specific performance of the plea bargain, as outlined in defendant's affidavit of understanding, or (b) that defendant be given the option to withdraw his pleas and proceed to trial on the original charges. In the event that the circumstances require only that defendant be allowed to withdraw his pleas, he should be tried with a different judge presiding. See Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971); State v. Chalaire, 375 So.2d 107 (La. 1979).


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jun 25, 1984
452 So. 2d 160 (La. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CHARLES RAY SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jun 25, 1984

Citations

452 So. 2d 160 (La. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Deville

In a recent and similar case the Louisiana Supreme Court outlined a procedure to be followed when a plea…