Opinion
No. 93P24
08-21-2024
STATE of North Carolina v. Jack Labrittan SMITH
Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, For Jack Labrittan Smith. Isham Faison Hicks, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.
From N.C. Court of Appeals (23-575); From Stanly (16CRS51915-16) Twenty-Eighth District
Mark Montgomery, Attorney at Law, For Jack Labrittan Smith.
Isham Faison Hicks, Special Deputy Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th of April 2024 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of August 2024."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of April 2024 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 21st of August 2024,"