From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 5, 2018
2018-UP-298 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 5, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-298

07-05-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Lee Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001036

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of The South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted June 1, 2018

Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of The South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jul 5, 2018
2018-UP-298 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 5, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Lee Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 5, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-298 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 5, 2018)