From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Oct 30, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36899 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2018)

Opinion

NO. A-1-CA-36899

10-30-2018

STATE OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM E. SMITH III, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee William E. Smith III Rio Rancho, NM Pro Se Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY
George P. Eichwald, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM for Appellee William E. Smith III
Rio Rancho, NM Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
EMIL J. KIEHNE Judge /s/ _________
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Smith

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Oct 30, 2018
NO. A-1-CA-36899 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM E. SMITH III…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Oct 30, 2018

Citations

NO. A-1-CA-36899 (N.M. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2018)