From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 18, 2018
328 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2018)

Summary

rejecting the view that "the state bore the insurmountable burden of ruling out any possibility that the message was not sent by the defendant"

Summary of this case from State v. Acosta

Opinion

04-18-2018

STATE of Connecticut v. Brian J. SMITH

Jennifer B. Smith, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Timothy F. Costello, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 179 Conn.App. 734, 181 A.3d 118 (2018), is denied.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 18, 2018
328 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2018)

rejecting the view that "the state bore the insurmountable burden of ruling out any possibility that the message was not sent by the defendant"

Summary of this case from State v. Acosta
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Brian J. SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Apr 18, 2018

Citations

328 Conn. 927 (Conn. 2018)
182 A.3d 637

Citing Cases

State v. Porfil

" (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Smith , 179 Conn. App. 734, 761, 181 A.3d…

State v. Marrero

(Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Smith , 179 Conn. App. 734, 761, 181 A.3d 118,…