From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Sep 21, 2018
818 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 2018)

Opinion

No. 290A17

09-21-2018

STATE of North Carolina v. Marcus Marcel SMITH

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant/appellee. Jason Christopher Yoder, for defendant-appellant/appellee.


Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant/appellee.

Jason Christopher Yoder, for defendant-appellant/appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. With respect to the additional issues raised by the parties’ petitions for discretionary review, we conclude that discretionary review was improvidently allowed. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals as to these matters remains undisturbed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Sep 21, 2018
818 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MARCUS MARCEL SMITH

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Sep 21, 2018

Citations

818 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 2018)