From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Slusher

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 30, 1982
58 Or. App. 69 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 80-6-216, CA 19817

Argued and submitted December 14, 1981.

Remanded for resentencing June 30, 1982.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County, Patrick D. Gilroy, Judge.

Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Richard David Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant appeals his conviction for the crime of felony murder, ORS 163.115(1)(b), contending that his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. He also contends that imposition of a 25-year mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.

It is unnecessary to analyze defendant's arguments in detail under his first assignment of error. Suffice it to say there was ample evidence from which the jury could find that the charge was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Defendant's second assignment of error is that he was unconstitutionally sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for 25 years. Defendant is correct. State v. Shumway, 291 Or. 153, 630 P.2d 796 (1981).

Judgment affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Slusher

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 30, 1982
58 Or. App. 69 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Slusher

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM LEE SLUSHER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 30, 1982

Citations

58 Or. App. 69 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
647 P.2d 477