From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Skinner

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 0614 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2018 KW 0614

07-23-2018

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMES SKINNER


In Re: James Skinner, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 01-FELN-015992. BEFORE: THERIOT, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. Taking into account the circumstances of the petitioner, the district court erred by sustaining the State's procedural objections. Accordingly, the ruling sustaining the State's procedural objections is reversed and this matter is remanded for a hearing at which the district court will afford the State the opportunity to show that delay caused by events not under its control have prejudiced its ability to respond to, negate, or rebut the allegations of the application for postconviction relief. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930.8(B). If the State does not make this showing, the district court shall determine on the merits whether the State suppressed material exculpatory information in violation of the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) and progeny.

MRT

GH

AHP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Skinner

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Jul 23, 2018
NO. 2018 KW 0614 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Skinner

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMES SKINNER

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

NO. 2018 KW 0614 (La. Ct. App. Jul. 23, 2018)