From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Singleton

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 3, 2019
928 N.W.2d 667 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

Summary

finding the exact language used in Brocksieck's original sentencing order regarding appellate attorney fees to be improper

Summary of this case from State v. Brocksieck

Opinion

No. 18-0397

04-03-2019

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cameron D. SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, (until withdrawal) and Mary K. Conroy, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

Cameron Singleton appeals from judgment and sentence imposed upon his convictions for first-degree burglary, stalking in violation of a protective order, and eluding. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. Singleton

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 3, 2019
928 N.W.2d 667 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

finding the exact language used in Brocksieck's original sentencing order regarding appellate attorney fees to be improper

Summary of this case from State v. Brocksieck
Case details for

State v. Singleton

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cameron D. SINGLETON…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Apr 3, 2019

Citations

928 N.W.2d 667 (Iowa Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

State v. Moore

e.g., State v. Headley, 926 N.W.2d 545, 549, 553 (Iowa 2019); State v. McMurry, 925 N.W.2d 592, 601 (Iowa…

State v. Brocksieck

The corrected sentencing order should not include any language requiring Brocksieck to affirmatively…