From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2017
326 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)

Opinion

05-30-2017

STATE of Connecticut v. Casey SINCLAIR

John L. Cordani, Jr., assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Jennifer F. Miller, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


John L. Cordani, Jr., assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Jennifer F. Miller, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn.App. 1, 162 A.3d 43 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm the judgment of the trial court on the ground that any presumed violation of the defendant's confrontation clause rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the trial prosecutor's multiple acts of prosecutorial impropriety did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"


Summaries of

State v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 30, 2017
326 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Sinclair

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Casey SINCLAIR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 30, 2017

Citations

326 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2017)
163 A.3d 1205

Citing Cases

State v. Sinclair

This court granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, initially limited to the issues of…