From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sinchak

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 15, 1998
707 A.2d 1267 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

(SC 15854)

Decided January 15, 1998


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 134 (AC 16557), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the rule set forth in State v. McPhail, 213 Conn. 161 (1989), should be overruled and a midline approach should be used to decide whether one has been deprived of a fair and valid probable cause hearing?

"2. Whether the Appellate Court correctly determined the state's nondisclosure of exculpatory documents did prior to or at the probable cause hearing did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"

Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

John A. East III, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Sinchak

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jan 15, 1998
707 A.2d 1267 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Sinchak

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY SINCHAK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 15, 1998

Citations

707 A.2d 1267 (Conn. 1998)
707 A.2d 1267

Citing Cases

State v. Sinchak

" and (2) "Whether the Appellate Court correctly determined the state's nondisclosure of exculpatory…

Sinchak v. Strange

On January 15, 1998, the Connecticut Supreme Court granted certification limited to two issues. See State v.…