From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Sims

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Jul 25, 1996
Case No. 95-2020 (Wis. Ct. App. Jul. 25, 1996)

Opinion

Case No. 95-2020.

Opinion Released: July 25, 1996 Opinion Filed: July 25, 1996 This opinion will not be published. See RULE 809.23(1)(b)5, STATS.

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed.

Before Dykman, Sundby and Vergeront, JJ.


David Sims appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Sims pled no contest on two robbery counts and received two consecutive five-year sentences. He subsequently filed a motion for sentence modification, and for an order vacating his plea on one of the two counts, on the grounds that he was induced to plea by counsel's ineffective assistance. We conclude that the motion for sentence modification was untimely and that counsel provided Sims with effective representation. We therefore affirm.

Sims did not file a timely motion under § 974.02, STATS., and RULE 809.30(2)(h), STATS. Consequently, he lost the right to obtain relief on his claim that the trial court improperly exercised its sentencing discretion. Only claims of constitutional dimension survive after the time for § 974.02 motions has lapsed. See § 974.06(1), STATS.

Sims failed to establish that counsel ineffectively represented him on one of the two robbery charges. He contends that counsel's failure to properly investigate and discover exculpatory evidence forced him to plead despite his innocence. However, counsel testified at the hearing on Sims's motion that he investigated all available information and interviewed Sims's alleged alibi witness, but was not able to develop a viable defense. Counsel further testified that, in contrast, the State had a strong case against Sims, including an eyewitness's identification. He advised Sims accordingly and Sims voluntarily accepted the plea bargain. The trial court found counsel's testimony credible and we must accept that determination. See Turner v. State , 76 Wis.2d 1, 18, 250 N.W.2d 706, 715 (1977). The burden was on Sims to show that counsel's performance was deficient. State v. Pitsch , 124 Wis.2d 628, 633, 369 N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). Given the trial court's determination on the credibility of counsel's testimony, Sims has not met that burden.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Sims

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Jul 25, 1996
Case No. 95-2020 (Wis. Ct. App. Jul. 25, 1996)
Case details for

State v. Sims

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DAVID E.Z. SIMS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Date published: Jul 25, 1996

Citations

Case No. 95-2020 (Wis. Ct. App. Jul. 25, 1996)