From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Silcott

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Mar 12, 2018
2 Wn. App. 2d 1056 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

76293-1-I

03-12-2018

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RAY ALEXANDER SILCOTT, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ray Silcott appeals an order of restitution entered following his guilty pleas to third degree assault, felony harassment, and misdemeanor violation of a no-contact order. He contends, and the State concedes, that the order must be vacated because the State did not establish a causal connection between the crime and the claimed losses. We accept the State's concession. We leave the parties' dispute regarding the scope of the proceedings on remand for the trial court to resolve.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Silcott

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
Mar 12, 2018
2 Wn. App. 2d 1056 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Silcott

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RAY ALEXANDER SILCOTT, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

2 Wn. App. 2d 1056 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018)
2 Wash. App. 2d 1056